The UK voted to leave the European Union in 2016, since when, there has been some speculation as to what will happen with regard to pesticide regulations – for example, the EU regulatory system approved neonicotinoids, but then restricted several of them, and we don’t wish to see such restrictions lifted.
This is obviously of concern for anyone who cares about bees and pollinators, and specifically protecting them from poisoning by pesticides.
I was interested to read an article in Horticulture Week – you can find it here:
In particular, I’ll pull out the following points:
I conducted a little research into the bio-controls issue raised by Dr Grant. I found a very interesting paper, and here it is:
from which I lift the following:
Well that’s disheartening and also intriguing!
The idea that there are possible products out there for farmers, which don’t kill a myriad other species as well as the intended “pest” - and yet the struggle for commercial viability deters such products from coming to market - is very disappointing indeed.
He states that the UK took a lead in the EU, by adapting for the biopesticides industry, reducing regulatory fees for producers of bio-controls, and up-skilling the regulatory department.
As a result,
more biopesticides were launched onto the market (and due to the mutual
recognition process – onto the EU market as well – thanks to the UK
Unfortunately, the Labour Government at the time cut the UK regulatory department resources, and the Pesticide Regulations Directorate was absorbed into the CRD at the Health and Safety Executive in 2008.
We do not yet know how things will turn out for environmental regulation in the UK following Brexit.
Part of my campaigning has, for some years, been to push for farmers to receive independent information on pesticide threats, and to forbid the use of pesticide in the absence of real “threat”, and to prohibit prophylactic use. I believe this would immediately and substantially reduce the use of pesticides by farmers who in turn, would save a huge amount of money.
I will now add to this, that the UK has an opportunity to help the environment, wildlife, and farmers further, by championing Biopesticides once more.
I believe many farmers are open to support reduced chemical use – they want to reduce chemical use, and take better care of the soil.
I also support the notion that it is a good idea to support farmers financially, who take genuine steps to help the environment and wildlife whilst growing food – and move away from an EU system, which enables Saudi Princes who breed race horses to collect money in the form of “EU grants” (which of course, comes – via convoluted means, from the UK tax payers’ pocket).
To quote Prof Dave Goulson (as I have many times on this website!):
His sentiments are echoed by Green politician and peer, Baroness Jenny Jones and I believe he is right, despite all the current uncertainty. We may miss opportunities by moaning and whining, rather than taking positive, lobbying action.
Anyway, my hope is that the UK will take positive measures soon – because 3 next generation neonics have already been approved by the EU regulatory system.
I believe these 3 new toxins would escape any EU restriction or ban on neonicotinoids, quite simply because they have been categorized as “something
different” from neonics, although they work in a similar way to the restricted
poisons (they are systemic insecticides).
However, we do not yet know how things will work out!
From 2014 - 2015, the UK allowed 3 "emergency applications" of neonicotinoids for a 5% OSR area, but rejected applications for emergency use in 2016.
During the same time period, at least 62 emergency applications (that we know of) were granted for the use of neonicotinoids, across the EU, and the EU Commission has been criticised by Client Earth for doing nothing to stop abuse of the system.
Like so much that is happening right now, time will tell!
COPYRIGHT 2010 - 2021: WWW.BUZZABOUTBEES.NET
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.