There's no doubt about it, honey bee
health is a real concern - and not only to beekeepers. When our honey
bees are sick, what is this telling us about the environment?
Recently in the European Union, there was a Motion for a
Parliamentary Resolution: Honey Bee Health and the Challenges of the
Beekeeping Sector, a link to which can be found below.
What this will mean in practice for individual countries within the EU is yet to be seen.
Whilst it appeared there were some positive points within the Motion, there was one I did not agree with.
It was this:
On the face of it, this may seem like a good idea - afterall, it concerns honey bee health.
However, I think there is a grim irony that
on the one hand, a company like BayerCropScience manufactures both
neonicotinoid pesticides, and on the other, also makes pharmaceuticals
for treating honey bees.
I'll admit, I have some concerns about medicines for bees. Here is just one research report:
In-Hive Medications May Inhibit Xenobiotic Efflux Transporters and Endanger Honeybees
Of course, Dr Marla Spivak also pointed out that honey bees are given an insecticide, in order to treat for varroa mite (the offending target insect)!
And let's consider Varroa mite further, within the context of neonicotinoids. A natural defence against Varroa mites for bees, is grooming. Bees also groom in defence against diseases and fungi.
Yet Bayer admit that one of their pesticides (neonicotinoid Imidacloprid), hinders the ability of termites to groom (social insects, like bees), which they say makes fungi 10,000 times more lethal to termites - read more.
Bayer say they have not tested for imidacloprid’s impact on grooming in bees – and the UK regulatory system does not require for them to do so. If Bayer care so much about honey bee health, why have they not taken the initiative and performed these tests?
You can read more, as well as download the Bayer leaflet, and watch a video on my page about Varroa Mite.
I am concerned, because if bees are unable to groom, then how can they defend themselves adequately against varroa mite, fungi and diseases? Impairment of grooming is of course only one issue, and there may be other factors and ways in which neonicotinoids may make bees more vulnerable to predators and pathogens. You can read further about Varroa and neonicotinoids here and may page about neonicotinoids and nosema.
I am sure you can see the disconcerting irony therefore, if companies such as Bayer, are to be given “incentives” for developing more medications for honey bee health issues such as Varroa mite. Do we know that Bayer's neonicotinoid pesticide does not hamper the honey bee's ability to deal with the mite naturally itself? Do we know for sure that neonicoitinoids do not make bees more susceptible to diseases in the first place?
that Varroa is believed to have first been discovered in the UK in
1992. Imidacloprid was introduced to the UK in 1993, and has grown
significantly in use – indeed, neonicotinoids have extended their usage
base from agriculture into household/garden pesticides, golf course
treatments and so on – some councils may even spray them in public
spaces or allow their contractors to do so. It is not the only
neonicotinoid or systemic pesticide used in the UK or overseas, either.
Also, what is actually meant by “incentives” for the pharmaceutical industry? Does it mean financial awards to the end benefit of companies like Bayer, (directly or indirectly such as via the BBSRC, whose mission is partly "To advance knowledge and technology (including the promotion and support of the exploitation of research outcomes), and provide trained scientists and engineers, which meet the needs of users and beneficiaries (including the agriculture, bioprocessing, chemical, food, healthcare, pharmaceutical and other biotechnological related industries and its institutions),"?
If so, then I am not happy. I see no reason for the tax payer to foot the bill. Let the Agrochemical industries of this world first stop making toxic pesticides – and let that be their main contribution to honey bee health!
Of course, there is the issue of “what is happening to other pollinators and invertebrates?” – let alone the wildlife that depends on them – indeed, the eco-system. Honey bee health products, even if they were effective, along with honey bee breeding programmes, are merely sticking plaster approaches to a very serious, wider problem.
Honey bee health is one thing. But what
exactly are the impacts of pesticides (not just neonicotinoids) and
other chemicals on frogs, bats
and other creatures? Here is an interesting and disturbing report:
Behind Mass Die-Offs, Pesticides Lurk as Culprit
. Then there is the report implicating neonicotinoids in decline of grassland birds.
I do worry about the world that we are in danger of leaving behind, in order to allow a few organisations to pursue profit.
we have neonicotinoids, which are used over a large area of the world
today, and are mobile in soil, groundwater and surface water. But
that's just one set of chemicals. What about the toxic soup effect of pesticides, herbicides and other pollutants?
remember that the agrochemical industry actively lobby politicians in
order to help them meet their goals. I suggest there is no time for
apathy, and no time to lose. Each of us can act - and this affects
everyone at the end of the day. The practical things we do individually
to help bees and other species, help a great deal, but I also think
it's time for more people to lobby politicians on behalf of biodiversity
- including bees.
It's not an overnight process, but it will surely happen much faster if more people speak out!
EU Motion: Honey Bee Health and the Challenges of the Beekeeping Sector
Go from Honey Bee Health to further information about how you can help the bees: 10 Things You Can Do To Save Bees
How Eating Organic Helps Save The Bees
Grow Your Own And Help The Bees
Positive Messages - Spread The Word
Help The Bees - By Bee-ing The Change
COPYRIGHT 2010 - 2017: WWW.BUZZABOUTBEES.NET
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.